Fifth Marian Dogma

Thursday
Sep 09th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Apologetics

FAQ #1 - Where is that in Scripture?

Do we find support for the proposed dogma of Mary Coredemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces and Advocate in Scripture?

Read more...

FAQ #2 - Church Fathers?

Do we find support for this proposed dogma in the faith of the early Church?
Read more...

FAQ #3 - Rationale for Dogma?

What is the rationale for this dogma?

Read more...

FAQ #4 - Detract from Jesus?

Does the designation of Mary as Coredemptrix or Mediatrix of all graces detract from the uniqueness and all-sufficiency of Jesus Christ, the one Redeemer and the one Mediator?
Read more...

FAQ #5 - Ecumenism?

What effect will this dogma have on ecumenism?
Read more...

FAQ #6 - Magisterium?

What does the Magisterium of the Church think of the proposal for this dogma?
Read more...

FAQ #7 - Why Now?

What is the urgency for this dogma?
Read more...

Common Objections

A Response to 7 Common Objections

 

 

To Lysbeth, my beloved wife; and to our precious children, John-Mark, Michael, Christiana, Mariana, Joseph, Annaleah, Mary-Bernadette, and Philumena.

Imprimatur:

Ernesto Cardinal Corripio Ahumada
Mexico City
May 1, 2001

 

Part I (Objections 1-3)

Part II (Objections 4-5)

Part III (Objections 6-7)

A Response to 7 Common Objections - Part I

PART 1

On December 23, 2000, The New York Times ran a major story on the international Catholic movement Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici, which is seeking to encourage the papal definition of the Blessed Virgin Mary as "Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces, and Advocate." Existing Catholic teaching of Mary as a Co­redemptrix refers to the unique participation of Mary, Mother of Jesus, in the redemption accomplished by Jesus Christ, the divine Redeemer.

The New York Times article was in turn reprinted in a great number of U.S. major newspapers and therefore sparked great and high-spirited debate across the country and internationally over the idea of the Blessed Virgin as a "Co-redemptrix" with Jesus Christ.

Although slightly different in their expression, most objections to the teaching of the Catholic Church of the Blessed Virgin Mary as Co-redemptrix fall into the same basic categories. The following is a summary of seven common objections to Mary as Co-redemptrix, taken principally from recent newspaper publications, both secular and Christian. A basic response will be offered to each objection.

Objection 1:
Calling Mary a "Co-redemptrix" places her on an equal level with Jesus Christ, the Divine Son of God, making her something like a fourth person of the Trinity, a goddess or quasi-divine goddess, which is blasphemy for any true Christian.

Read more...

A Response to 7 Common Objections - Part 2

Continued from Part I 

PART 2

Objection 4:
To call Mary a co-redemptrix or to call Christians in general "co-redeemers" is to have a human being actively participate in redemption, which is a divine or, more specifically, a "theandric" activity, accomplished by Jesus Christ in his divine and human natures alone, and thus forbidden by Christianity. Such would only encourage paganism, since it places a human person, Mary, as part of a divine redemptive action which only Jesus Christ can accomplish.

Read more...
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 2